RANKING CRITERIA

Click one of the categories below to see the full details of the criteria category.

Individual Grading

(41% – 50%) [Excellent]

Distinguished self conspicuously by courage and fearlessness at the risk of her/his life above and beyond the call of duty to competently and compassionately care for patients with CoViD19.

(31% – 40%) [Very Good]

Distinguished self conspicuously by courage and fearlessness at the risk of her/his life within the call of duty to competently and compassionately care for patients with CoViD19.

(20% – 30%) [Good]

Displayed commitment, acceptable competence and compassionate Care provided to CoViD19 patients

(18% – 20%) [Excellent]
Extraordinary leadership that led the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary team/s to engage in a sustainable and long-term team-dynamics or quality-oriented processes that brought effective measurable results.
(14% – 17%) [Very Good]
Leadership that led to interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary team/s to engage team dynamics or processes for effective measurable results.
(10% – 13%) [Good]
Leadership that led a homogeneous team to engage in a team dynamics or processes for effective measurable results.

(19% – 20%) [Excellent]

Initiated or Pioneered and successfully contributed to the formulation, adoption, or implementation that enhance the Positive Practice Environments that benefited self and others in the hospital.

(14% – 17%) [Very Good]

Successfully contributed to the adoption or implementation that enhance the Positive Practice Environment that benefited self and others.

(10 – 13%) [Good]

Complied with the existing Positive Practice Environment that benefited self and others.

(9% – 10%) [Excellent]

Engaged in Self-directed or self-initiated High Impact Lifelong Learning Activities (initiated, organized or conducted research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis

(6% – 8%) [Very Good]

Engaged in Institution-initiated High Impact Lifelong Learning Activities (contributed to research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis

 

(2% – 5%) [Good]

Engaged in Institution-imposed Lifelong Learning Activities (attended or participated in research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis

 

 

Team Grading

(41% – 50%) [Excellent] 18 – 20 Extraordinary collaborative and synergistic leadership that led the diverse interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary team/s to engage sustainable teamdynamics or documented processes or institutional policy for effective measurable results for the institution (31% – 40%) [Very Good] 14 – 17 Collaborative and synergistic Leadership that led to the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary team/s to engage team dynamics or processes for effective measurable results for the department. (20% – 30%) [Good] 10 – 13 Leadership that led a homogeneous teams to engage team dynamics or processes for effective measurable results.
(18% – 20%) [Excellent]

(41 – 50) Team Members have Distinguished themselves conspicuously by courage and fearlessness at the risk of their lives above and beyond the call of duty to care for patients with.
(14% – 17%) [Very Good]

(31 – 40) Team Members have Distinguished themselves conspicuously by courage and fearlessness at the risk of her/his life within the call of duty to care for patients with CoViD19
(10% – 13%) [Good]

(20 – 30) Members displayed acceptable competence and compassionate Health Care provided to CoViD19 patients
(19% – 20%) [Excellent]
The Team Initiated or Pioneered and successfully contributed to the adoption or implementation that enhance the Positive Practice Environment that benefited themselves, the department and the institution.
(14% – 17%) [Very Good]
Successfully contributed to the adoption or implementation that enhance the Positive Practice Environment that benefited self and others.
(10 – 13%) [Good]
Complied with the existing Positive Practice Environment that benefited self and others.
(9% – 10%) [Excellent] The Team Engaged in Self-directed or self-initiated High Impact Lifelong Learning Activities (initiated, organized or conducted research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis (6% – 8%) [Very Good] The Team Engaged in Institution-initiated High Impact Lifelong Learning Activities (contributed to research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis (2% – 5%) [Good] The Team Engaged in Institutionimposed Lifelong Learning Activities (attended or participated in research, publication, workshops, conferences) during the Crisis